Must show that another road user has actually been inconvenienced by defendants driving not enough to show there was potential for inconvenience. Which offence is described?

• A. Without reasonable consideration
• B. Without due care and attention
• C. Dangerously
• D. S2 RTA 1988

Answer: (A)

The key idea here is that some driving offences hinge on the effect your driving has on other road users, not just on your own conduct. Specifically, one offence requires that another road user has actually been inconvenienced by the way you drove.

Driving without reasonable consideration for other road users is the right fit because its element centers on your behavior toward others and the real impact it has—actual inconvenience caused to another road user. If no one is inconvenienced, that particular offence isn’t made out, even if your driving was questionable.

The other options focus on different standards: without due care and attention looks at failing to drive with a reasonable standard of care, which can be charged even without a proven inconvenience to others; driving dangerously (or S2 RTA 1988) involves driving that is dangerous or poses a serious risk, again not anchored to actual inconvenience to a specific road user.