A person won't be convicted under S172(3) if they can show they didn't know who the driver was. Under which subsection?

Unlock all questions

This demo includes only 20 questions. Upgrade to access hundreds of questions, flashcards, exam simulations, and disable ads.

Full question bankExam simulationsFlashcards
From $24.99Unlock all

Prepare for the Road Policing, Crime Laws and Public Order in the UK Test. Utilize multiple choice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations to enhance your understanding. Maximize your readiness for success!

Multiple Choice

A person won't be convicted under S172(3) if they can show they didn't know who the driver was. Under which subsection?

Explanation:
S172(7) RTA 1988 is the defence you’re testing. Section 172 imposes the duty to provide the driver’s identity, but subsection (7) says that a person won’t be convicted under the section if they did not know who the driver was and could not reasonably have known. So, if the keeper genuinely didn’t know the driver, they can avoid conviction for failing to provide the information. The other options don’t give this specific defence: the notice of intended prosecution is the document, Section 172(3) is the offence itself, and Section 172(4) isn’t the relevant defence in this scenario.

S172(7) RTA 1988 is the defence you’re testing. Section 172 imposes the duty to provide the driver’s identity, but subsection (7) says that a person won’t be convicted under the section if they did not know who the driver was and could not reasonably have known. So, if the keeper genuinely didn’t know the driver, they can avoid conviction for failing to provide the information. The other options don’t give this specific defence: the notice of intended prosecution is the document, Section 172(3) is the offence itself, and Section 172(4) isn’t the relevant defence in this scenario.

More Multiple Choice Questions
Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy